Competitor Profile: Via Nanobook
June 11th, 2007 by antThe Via Nanobook is an ultra-portable platform recently announced.
Specifications:
Processor: 1.2GHz Via C7-M
Chipset: Via VX700
Memory: DDR2 SO-DIMM up to 1GB
Storage: 30GB or 60GB hard drive
Graphics: Based on Via UniChrome Pro II, Shared 64mb
Display: 7 inch 840×480 LCD, Touchscreen
Audio: Stereo speakers, microphone, line out
Networking: Ethernet, 802.11b/g, Bluetooth
Misc: 4 in 1 card reader, 2 USB ports
Battery: 4 rechargeable cells, for up to 4.5 hours of battery life
Dimensions: 9.1 x 6.7 x 1.2 inches (230 x 171 x 29.4mm)
Weight: under 2 pounds
Price: Devices that use this platform will probably reach ~$600
So what does an extra $400 get you? It appears as though a faster processor, more hard drive space, bluetooth, touchscreen, video card, and slightly longer battery life. Devices that use the Via Nanobook platform should also run Windows Vista.
My thoughts? The screen is small and the design is lacking if it is kept the same in production devices. In comparison to other competing UMPC devices, pricing is much more affordable. But, the Asus Eee PC will offer almost the same features of devices using the Nanobook platform for just about 1/3 of the price, making the Asus Eee PC 701 more attractive to eyes, minds, and wallets.
For more information on the Nanobook, check out this article at Linux Devices

June 13th, 2007 at 5:51 am
You may be interested in the ultra-cheap sub-notebook comparison matrix I started at Mobileread, which includes the OLPC 2B1, Intel Classmate, Palm Foleo, Asus EEE and Via Nanobook.
June 13th, 2007 at 9:24 am
[...] Collin has posted a comment pointing us to his very useful “ultra-cheap sub-notebook comparison matrix.” It’s [...]
July 29th, 2007 at 3:12 pm
It’s funny how subnotebook designs have to make space around the screen to accommodates a full keyboard. The clock design on the nanobook is the stupidest one I’ve seen so far though. Isn’t there a clock on the bottom right in windows??
Lol.
September 6th, 2007 at 12:07 am
Nice
September 7th, 2007 at 7:41 am
Nice!
September 10th, 2007 at 3:09 am
Sorry